Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 12, 08:55
2: Dec 11, 23:59
3: Dec 11, 14:43
4: Dec 11, 11:29
5: Dec 11, 07:59
6: Dec 10, 18:15
7: Dec 10, 12:28
8: Dec 10, 09:30
9: Dec 10, 05:59
10: Dec 9, 17:07
11: Dec 9, 13:47
12: Dec 9, 10:33
13: Dec 9, 07:33
14: Dec 8, 17:50
15: Dec 8, 10:32
16: Dec 8, 06:23
17: Dec 7, 16:52
18: Dec 7, 07:17
19: Dec 6, 14:40
20: Dec 6, 10:07
Posts: 161
In response to
"
Well, Jovian's reply to this was prescient -- (link*)
"
by
znufrii, silly old man
I'll eat crow soon on this case though, it's not clear why they took the case yet, but it seems like they will uphold some version of this power
Posted by
JackDawson (aka dawson)
May 12 '20, 09:21
(JINX!!)
Responses:
Yes, the tea readers seem to think Roberts will split the baby somehow. -- nm
-
Reagen
May 12, 09:22
4
The Roberts tea leaders are, sorry, complete morons -- nm
-
JackDawson
May 12, 09:24
Are you talking about the SEC v. Liu case? Or the subpoenas? In the Liu case, all 8 that spoke seemed to favor the SEC from a little to a lot -- nm
-
JackDawson
May 12, 09:23
2
I'm talking about the taxes case.
-
Reagen
May 12, 09:26
1
It’s certainly possible. Gorsuch and Roberts are playing both sides, Kavanaugh Thomas and Alito are not -- nm
-
JackDawson
May 12, 09:28
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.