Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 02:38
2: Dec 3, 14:19
3: Dec 3, 11:17
4: Dec 3, 07:33
5: Dec 2, 17:22
6: Dec 2, 11:48
7: Dec 2, 08:21
8: Dec 1, 17:33
9: Dec 1, 11:23
10: Nov 30, 15:54
11: Nov 30, 09:41
12: Nov 29, 16:44
13: Nov 29, 08:01
14: Nov 28, 16:19
15: Nov 28, 09:42
16: Nov 27, 18:07
17: Nov 27, 12:04
18: Nov 27, 08:26
19: Nov 26, 18:06
20: Nov 26, 12:05
Posts: 165
In response to
"
"That's new!" is probably not something you want to hear during a static fire test. -- nm
"
by
znufrii, silly old man
"If it was methane, it'd be igniting in the flare, correct?"
Posted by
znufrii, silly old man (aka znufrii)
May 29 '20, 12:26
*BOOM*
Responses:
the detonation is from under the ship, not at the flare
-
Reagen
May 29, 12:30
5
You have to admire the timing of the commentary, if nothing else. -- nm
-
znufrii, silly old man
May 29, 12:33
1
The frame by frame analysis by the commentators from 10-15 minutes ago is fun -- nm
-
JD
May 29, 12:44
Maaaaybe. The camera view makes the flare stack look a lot closer than it is. The cloud may have taken some time to reach the stack
-
TWuG
May 29, 12:32
2
It would be an *insane* engineering failure to have an active flare in proximity to a potential propellant leak.
-
Reagen
May 29, 12:36
1
It can't be too far away and still serve to offload the methane from the ship. Methane gas to be burned off, it can't be vented. -- (edited)
-
TWuG
May 29, 12:49
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.