Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 154
In response to
"
Mike Trout won’t play? The owners are more than happy not to pay him and pay the salary of a player making the minimum instead.
"
by
spamlet
What you're describing destroys the game of baseball by tearing down its stars. -- nm
Posted by
David (aka David)
Jun 8 '20, 08:57
(No message)
Responses:
er, though for that specific example, MLB already went after Trout for apparently not being enough of a star
-
JD
Jun 8, 09:06
But more seriously, there will always be more ball players. If fans have shown anything, they are more loyal to teams than players.
-
spamlet
Jun 8, 09:01
1
Yes, I'm sure strike baseball would go over swimmingly. -- nm
-
David
Jun 8, 09:06
Hi. -- nm
-
1994
Jun 8, 08:59
2
That's exactly my point. -- nm
-
David
Jun 8, 09:06
1
It was down for a couple of years and now franchises are worth many multiples of what they were then so for an owner that sounds like a win. -- nm
-
spamlet
Jun 8, 09:19
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.