Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 10, 18:15
2: Dec 10, 12:28
3: Dec 10, 09:30
4: Dec 10, 05:59
5: Dec 9, 17:07
6: Dec 9, 13:47
7: Dec 9, 10:33
8: Dec 9, 07:33
9: Dec 8, 17:50
10: Dec 8, 10:32
11: Dec 8, 06:23
12: Dec 7, 16:52
13: Dec 7, 07:17
14: Dec 6, 14:40
15: Dec 6, 10:07
16: Dec 6, 07:32
17: Dec 5, 19:48
18: Dec 5, 12:51
19: Dec 5, 10:39
20: Dec 5, 07:07
Posts: 159
In response to
"
WHO clarifies that they estimate 16% of people are asymptomatic and can transmit the virus. -- (link)
"
by
ty97
"That it could be as high as 40%. They also regret saying transmission is “very rare.” -- (link)
Posted by
ty97
Jun 9 '20, 07:06
(No message)
https://twitter.com/ASlavitt/status/1270349047442714625
(twitter.com)
Responses:
[insert incredulous blinking guy meme here] -- nm
-
JaxSean
Jun 9, 07:21
40% of 16% is about 6% of cases coming from asymptomatic people. That's at least uncommon.
-
TWuG
Jun 9, 07:15
4
I read it as 16-40% but perhaps I was wrong. -- nm
-
ty97
Jun 9, 07:54
Practically the problem (in any event) was that it suggested you don't really need to worry about asymptomatic people. That's clearly an overstatement -- nm
-
pmb
Jun 9, 07:19
2
Right. The damage is done. Their statement was misleading. -- nm
-
Andie
Jun 9, 08:14
Barring explanation, it was stupid for them to say. It might matter if we we're testing everyone and isolating carriers -- nm
-
TWuG
Jun 9, 07:20
Jeebus. They have no integrity. -- nm
-
Inigo
Jun 9, 07:07
(Good morning David) -- nm
-
ty97
Jun 9, 07:06
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.