ST Alpha - "Her numbers are in line with others in neighboring areas and her opponent would need every absentee ballot to go their way. " (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

In response to "They’re not allowed to start counting absentee ballots for a week, and apparently some places have more absentee than in person. -- nm" by mafic

Her numbers are in line with others in neighboring areas and her opponent would need every absentee ballot to go their way.

Posted by Krusty without grass (aka Krustylu) Jun 24 '20, 05:44

It should have been called for her already.

Responses:

Dunno. Each district would at least know how many absentee ballots they’ve mailed out, and it may not be uniform. - mafic Jun 24, 05:52 6
- Last primary there were 30k votes tallied. They're at 57k right now so a lot more people showed up to vote this year and many more chose Clarke. - Krusty without grass Jun 24, 05:56
- uh huh. -- nm - Diva Jun 24, 05:53
- I'm sure the BOE knows, but they aren't the ones "calling" the races, the news media is -- nm - ty97 Jun 24, 05:53 3
  - Sure, but NYT has only called a few dem primaries. Some are higher margins, some are lower. I wouldn’t be surprised if they knew how many absentee - mafic Jun 24, 06:12
  - AND, there are already almost *double* the total votes of the close 2018 primary race that she won - ty97 Jun 24, 05:58 1
    - I get being cautious this year with all of the absentee ballots but this race is over and should have been called already. - Krusty without grass Jun 24, 06:01
It's 62.3% to 17.9%. I think they can safely call the race with 57k votes tallied. That's more than the total votes in the last primary. -- (edited) - Krusty without grass Jun 24, 05:51

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.