ST Alpha - "more" (Reading a Post)

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 158

In response to "It got remanded back down for consideration but the President can't claim absolute immunity because he's President." by spamlet

Posted by spamlet Jul 9 '20, 07:17

"The arguments here and in the Court of Appeals were limited to absolute immunity and heightened need. The Court of Appeals, however, has directed that the case may be returned to the District Court, where the President may raise further arguments as appropriate."

Responses:

(If I'm right about the below, I expect Alito will ahve said so--but haven't gotten there) -- nm - JackDawson Jul 9, 07:20
Those are all nice statements but given how the litigation has proceeded and the fact that this is a grand jury subpoena, I'm not sure what protection - JackDawson Jul 9, 07:18 2
- I have no idea on that. Just quoting the case :) -- nm - spamlet Jul 9, 07:20 1
  - Yeah I mean scotusblog is posting those choice paragraphs without much analysis of them (they will post it later) -- nm - JackDawson Jul 9, 07:24

Post a message top

more

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.