Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 159
In response to
"
Why don't the Redskins have a new nickname planned yet? Probably because some realtor in Alexandria beat them to the punch and trademarked every -- (link)
"
by
Beaker
Aren’t you supposed to have some purpose in trademarking a name? Like, this is pure squatting, right? -- nm
Posted by
Will Hunting (aka JoeMetz)
Jul 13 '20, 07:15
(No message)
Responses:
Yes. It has to attach to some sort of brand. And even then there are likely limitations if there's no reason for confusion. -- nm
-
pmb
Jul 13, 07:30
Even if they'd win in court, it's probably cheaper to just buy the one they want, I assume. -- nm
-
Dano
Jul 13, 07:18
"I'm considering new names for my realtor business" -- nm
-
Beaker
Jul 13, 07:17
2
That probably wouldn't interfere with their using the trademark. It really would only likely be an issue if it was another professional sports team.
-
pmb
Jul 13, 07:29
RADSKINS. That's the best. -- nm
-
oblique
Jul 13, 07:17
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
