In response to
"Because having someone other than a parent watch the child is already disruptive enough to the child. Being in a familiar environment helps. -- nm"
by
Mop (235 lbs)
|
i can understand this to an extent too. though one would argue a change of scenery may be kinda fun for a kiddo.
Posted by
kare (aka kare)
Jun 16 '09, 12:49
|
and that's such a minor think, i still would have to say that i would err on the side of less inconvenience for the babysitter.
|
Responses:
-
I think it depends on a lot of things. The age of the kid, the personality of the kid, the babysitter. It's mostly that it's easiest for the parents
-
pmb
Jun 16, 12:56
-
Change of scenery isn't what babysitting is about though.
-
musubi
Jun 16, 12:53
14
-
fair enough. most parents i've babysat for (friends and family) obviously feel the same way
-
kare
Jun 16, 12:55
12
-
well, there's a couple distinctions here. one, if its a favor, that's a little different than someone I'm paying,.
-
TFox
Jun 16, 12:57
-
You know it's often a chore to just load kids into the car and pack all the stuff they will need for the stay, etc. right? -- nm
-
con_carne
Jun 16, 12:57
7
-
No, I think parents recognize this is an inconvenience for the sitter (well, at least I do), but it's part of the job requirement.
-
musubi
Jun 16, 12:57
2
-
Especially for overnight. An afternoon? Sure. -- nm
-
Spawn
Jun 16, 12:55
|
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
|
|