Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 163
In response to
"
Yeah, but owning definitely costs more.
"
by
Subversive
But if you move in 10 years, you get some money fir your house
Posted by
ty97
Jun 17 '09, 09:39
Renters get jack
There are pros and cons to both. I'm constantly torn
Responses:
Tell that to people in Detroit -- nm
-
decline
Jun 17, 09:43
Renters have more flexibility and less responsibility, but no equity. Owners have less flexibility and more responsibility
-
TWuG
Jun 17, 09:42
Absolutely, but a strong argument can be made that if you take the money you save by renting and invest it, you'll have more than the equity you lost.
-
Subversive
Jun 17, 09:41
4
[deleted]
3
Oh, I see. You think we're still talking about you. :)
-
Subversive
Jun 17, 09:45
2
[deleted]
1
I've seen some fairly convincing arguments that renting is cheaper, but of course it totally depends on the market.
-
Subversive
Jun 17, 10:00
ever heard of a renting bubble? -- nm
-
Danedukenuuk
Jun 17, 09:41
2
why would you rent a bubble? -- nm
-
mafic
Jun 17, 09:47
1
those crazy danes. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Jun 17, 09:47
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
