ST Alpha - "You're ignoring the cost of making the movie itself. I assumed $200m for the film and $50m for marketing in a reduced way." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 157

In response to "Yes, Spammy, I literally pulled those numbers from an article about the most profitable blockbusters of 2019." by David

You're ignoring the cost of making the movie itself. I assumed $200m for the film and $50m for marketing in a reduced way.

Posted by spamlet Aug 11 '20, 08:24

$350 + 250 = 600. 600/30 = 20m.

Responses:

I’m definitely not. Those costs get split among investors, but at $37, Disney brings in $444 million. - David Aug 11, 08:34 2
- you mention it and I'd be interesting in how this will affect the pay scale of talent. what of the times actors/actresses/directors get a share of the - Beaker Aug 11, 08:38 1
  - There have been several stories lately about how producers are trying to move away percentage gross with talent. - David Aug 11, 08:43

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.