ST Alpha - "At the end of the day, Woodward didn't swear an oath to protect Americans. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 158

In response to "Yeah, I seem to be in a minority position suggesting blaming Woodward is at best rather beside the point and at most distracting from the real culprit -- nm" by Qale

At the end of the day, Woodward didn't swear an oath to protect Americans. -- nm

Posted by loosilu (aka loosilu2) Sep 10 '20, 07:43

(No message)

Responses:

Sure, but there is still the question of ethics -- nm - ty97 Sep 10, 07:45 1
- Yes, but there's no reason to think it would have changed policy or the response you're seeing. He put it to the voters to decide. I've been on the - pmb Sep 10, 07:52
I would disagree. If the book came out a year ago, it would be forgotten and accomplish nothing. This close to the election it might move the bar. -- nm - Wakanda Forever Sep 10, 07:44 3
- Yes, this is possible, especially as some (small amounts of) voting have actually started - ty97 Sep 10, 07:47 2
  - You can throw out the last one, as nothing would do that. So the first two, he did it at the right time. -- nm - Wakanda Forever Sep 10, 07:54
  - Regardless what someone thinks they answer is, this will serve as a good moral/ethic discussion topic for countless philosophy classes -- nm - ty97 Sep 10, 07:48

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.