Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 10, 18:15
2: Dec 10, 12:28
3: Dec 10, 09:30
4: Dec 10, 05:59
5: Dec 9, 17:07
6: Dec 9, 13:47
7: Dec 9, 10:33
8: Dec 9, 07:33
9: Dec 8, 17:50
10: Dec 8, 10:32
11: Dec 8, 06:23
12: Dec 7, 16:52
13: Dec 7, 07:17
14: Dec 6, 14:40
15: Dec 6, 10:07
16: Dec 6, 07:32
17: Dec 5, 19:48
18: Dec 5, 12:51
19: Dec 5, 10:39
20: Dec 5, 07:07
Posts: 165
In response to
"
The second I saw that article I knew there’d be a lot of people that suddenly are tax experts. The internet is going to be unbearable tonight. -- nm
"
by
MDH
to me (as an accountant), I don't see it as shady. Just proof of what an absolute trainwreck he is as a business person to have those sort of losses
Posted by
Beaker (aka Anniebecca)
Sep 27 '20, 15:24
to offset income
Responses:
if you look at the article, specific examples are of the bullshit variety - maintaining that a vacation estate is a business for losses
-
Reagen
Sep 27, 15:34
1
I have personal experience with that "my lawyers vs the IRS" point. My wife benefits from a family trust that the IRS didn't want to litigate
-
TWuG
Sep 27, 15:37
Wasn’t he allowed to double-deduct business loan defaults as personal losses for a time?
-
znufrii needs to cancel his gym membership
Sep 27, 15:26
(without seeing the detailed returns of course) -- nm
-
Beaker
Sep 27, 15:25
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.