Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 12:27
2: Dec 4, 09:36
3: Dec 4, 02:38
4: Dec 3, 14:19
5: Dec 3, 11:17
6: Dec 3, 07:33
7: Dec 2, 17:22
8: Dec 2, 11:48
9: Dec 2, 08:21
10: Dec 1, 17:33
11: Dec 1, 11:23
12: Nov 30, 15:54
13: Nov 30, 09:41
14: Nov 29, 16:44
15: Nov 29, 08:01
16: Nov 28, 16:19
17: Nov 28, 09:42
18: Nov 27, 18:07
19: Nov 27, 12:04
20: Nov 27, 08:26
Posts: 151
Either I’m bad at math or just confused as to why Houston went for 2. -- nm
Posted by
Dano (aka dano)
Oct 18 '20, 12:56
(No message)
Responses:
Well, it cost them the game. -- nm
-
New, Better David
Oct 18, 13:18
It would have put them up two scores. I hate it, but I understand the logic. -- nm
-
New, Better David
Oct 18, 12:58
6
As opposed to forcing the opponent to have to score and go for 2 to tie? I suppose it’s a strategy. -- nm
-
Dano
Oct 18, 13:00
5
The logic is the HC thinks % of his offense scoring 2 is greater than the chance of his defense preventing TEN from driving the length of the field. -- nm
-
Strongbad
Oct 18, 13:25
The assumption is that they wouldn't go for two if only down seven. -- nm
-
New, Better David
Oct 18, 13:03
3
Right. But they would have had to if they were down 8. Now it only took an extra point to send it into OT. -- nm
-
Dano
Oct 18, 13:07
2
Like I said, I hate it, but he went for the win. And he made the right call about Tennessee playing to tie rather than win.
-
New, Better David
Oct 18, 13:11
agreed, as per davids explanation -- nm*
-
Bud S. Pumpkins 🎃
Oct 18, 13:11
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
