Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 164
Politically, the most valuable real estate this cycle might turn out to be frikkin Omaha. Lawdy, lawdy, lawdy we need election reform -- nm
Posted by
crash davis (aka crash davis)
Nov 4 '20, 07:51
(No message)
Responses:
Lawdy Miss Clawdy -- (link)
-
mud
Nov 4, 08:10
[youtube]
I really want to do away with the Electoral College. Granted I don't really understand the EC, but I know it's messed up recent elections. -- nm
-
sycor
Nov 4, 07:57
29
It can't be abolished without a Constitutional amendment, but there are possible workarounds. There are also enough swing states that election reform
-
mara
Nov 4, 08:05
It was designed, along with the 3/5 compromise, to provide assurance to slave holding states that they would maintain
-
TWuG
Nov 4, 08:05
Nothing is "messed up". It works as intended. Popular vote elections would be dramatically different in the US (urban areas only, rural areas fucked)
-
oblique
Nov 4, 08:04
26
This urban vs rural thing makes no sense to me. Votes should count the same no matter where people live. -- nm
-
mara
Nov 4, 08:09
16
If the electoral college is ideal, why do we use the popular vote to elect governors? Shouldn't people in rural counties have more say than Chicago? -- nm
-
mara
Nov 4, 08:11
US Elections are not directly made by people. States elect presidents. People decide how their state votes. -- nm*
-
oblique
Nov 4, 08:10
14
But it has given voters in some states inordinate power. At the senate level as well. These things were put in place to prevent a tyranny of the
-
pmb
Nov 4, 08:15
1
I don't disagree. I just also think that we probably need to tread lightly here as a country -- nm
-
oblique
Nov 4, 08:17
I know how it works. I was addressing your "dramatically different" statement, as it seemed to imply the difference is undesirable. -- nm
-
mara
Nov 4, 08:13
11
The election would be dominated by some very large urban centers (LA, Chicago, NY) where large swaths of the US would essentially be ignored
-
oblique
Nov 4, 08:16
10
CA was completely ignored this election and the last 3. No one campaigned here or bought ads.They only come here for our money in private fundraising
-
jnine
Nov 4, 09:05
That may have been the case 100 years ago, but it just doesn't hold anymore. Every vote counts. And candidates can access all of them. There aren't
-
pmb
Nov 4, 08:19
Nobody is being ignored if everybody's vote is treated exactly the same, the same way we elect governors. -- nm*
-
mara
Nov 4, 08:16
7
It doesn't matter what the practicality is. If those urban centers are predominantly democratic, it will *feel* to the rest of the US that their
-
oblique
Nov 4, 08:18
6
Well urban areas, with the majority of the population are being ignored now. I'm feeling pretty damn ignored in CA and I'm tired of it. Time for
-
jnine
Nov 4, 09:07
Instead of right now how it *feels* like the urban vote is undervalued? (because it is) -- nm*
-
Andie
Nov 4, 08:31
1
Just ftr - Canada has some issues with this as well. -- nm
-
Andie
Nov 4, 08:34
Nobody's saying it will fix the partisan nature of the US; we're saying we prefer every vote to count the same. -- nm
-
mara
Nov 4, 08:22
2
If it means we get a nationwide election system, I'm all for it
-
oblique
Nov 4, 08:27
1
Whether or not it causes Dems to lose is irrelevent to me, I just want every vote to count. -- nm
-
mara
Nov 4, 08:29
Without the EC every election but one since Reagan would have had a different winner. The EC is anti-democratic and fails to align
-
TWuG
Nov 4, 08:08
8
How you figuring that?
-
Reagen
Nov 4, 08:19
1
See my response to crash. I'm brain fried. -- nm
-
TWuG
Nov 4, 08:23
Whatchu talking about Willis? -- nm
-
crash davis
Nov 4, 08:11
1
Sorry. I'm tired and bungled the stat. What my post says is incorrect, but I'm too tired to fix it -- nm
-
TWuG
Nov 4, 08:17
It wasn't intended to align with the popular vote and I understand the frustration of those that want it to. It is one of many compromises in our
-
oblique
Nov 4, 08:10
3
Most compromises in the Constitution were made to accommodate slavers. Sad that we're still using them; horrifying that people keep defending them. -- nm
-
mara
Nov 4, 08:15
1
this -- nm
-
decline
Nov 4, 08:16
Re Your IM. It most certainly isn't. -- nm*
-
Andie
Nov 4, 08:13
I hope not.
-
Epiphany
Nov 4, 07:56
2
Its over, Biden won Omaha. I was making a statement that the one lone electoral vote he won there might loom large -- nm
-
crash davis
Nov 4, 08:02
1
he did?! shocking. stop scaring me Crash! :) -- nm
-
Epiphany
Nov 4, 08:14
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.