Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 11:23
2: Nov 30, 15:54
3: Nov 30, 09:41
4: Nov 29, 16:44
5: Nov 29, 08:01
6: Nov 28, 16:19
7: Nov 28, 09:42
8: Nov 27, 18:07
9: Nov 27, 12:04
10: Nov 27, 08:26
11: Nov 26, 18:06
12: Nov 26, 12:05
13: Nov 26, 08:29
14: Nov 25, 18:33
15: Nov 25, 11:12
16: Nov 25, 07:08
17: Nov 24, 13:17
18: Nov 23, 18:13
19: Nov 23, 06:17
20: Nov 22, 13:24
Posts: 152
In response to
"
Wait, you think we would be justified if you had thought of a more offensive wording for a "your kids are having a drug-fueled orgy" joke? -- nm
"
by
TFox
That is not what I said. You're misquoting me. -- nm
Posted by
secretslacker
Jun 21 '09, 13:13
(No message)
Responses:
It.... is a nearly word for word quote.
-
TFox
Jun 21, 13:14
7
I said "Probably having a drug-fueled orgy"...
-
secretslacker
Jun 21, 13:17
6
how many angels can dance on the head of that distinction? -- nm
-
Reagen
Jun 21, 13:18
Wow, that is a really important distinction. -- nm
-
TFox
Jun 21, 13:18
4
I'm not saying he *is* a douchebag, just that he's *probably* a douchebag. -- nm
-
Reagen
Jun 21, 13:20
See, if you were a professional writer like him, you'd understand.
-
Subversive
Jun 21, 13:19
2
we should change his nick from "shades" to "blinders", probably. -- nm
-
TFox
Jun 21, 13:20
I thought TFox was a lawyer. And they would know all about the importance of wording. -- nm
-
secretslacker
Jun 21, 13:20
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
