ST Alpha - "“We were going to say yes, but then we saw Borat 2...” -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 154

In response to " Pennsylvania Supreme Court rules against the Trump campaign in a case centered on whether election officials provided campaign observers “meaningful” -- (link)" by budice

“We were going to say yes, but then we saw Borat 2...” -- nm

Posted by David (aka David) Nov 17 '20, 13:45

(No message)

Responses:

This isn’t the case Rudy was arguing. -- nm - znufrii Nov 17, 13:50 3
- Actually we have no idea what case Rudy was arguing. Could have been any of them. -- nm - Court where Rudy is arguing Nov 17, 14:08 1
  - Fair point. -- nm - znufrii Nov 17, 14:09
- Not the point! -- nm - David Nov 17, 14:06

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.