|
In response to
"but could technically be appointed VP with <2 years left in the term. -- nm"
by
mafic
|
I don't think that argument would hold up. The intent was to not have someone serve more than two terms but acknowledging that you shouldn't be
Posted by
Reagen
Nov 17 '20, 14:10
|
shorted by talking over for a deceased or retired president. If you've already been elected twice, that fulfills the intent of the amendment and I would think most courts would rule 'nuh uh'.
|
Responses:
|