|
In response to
"I don't think so, or else we wouldn't sometimes use the term "military coup" & sometime not. I did think it had to involve violence of some kind tho -- nm"
by
mara
|
I'm not a history expert
Posted by
Strongbad (aka Rambler14)
Nov 19 '20, 07:45
|
I've always thought "military coup" was when the actual military is doing the overthrowing. Like when a top general was trying to use the threat of the military to assume control over the executive branch.
|
Responses:
|
