Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 02:38
2: Dec 3, 14:19
3: Dec 3, 11:17
4: Dec 3, 07:33
5: Dec 2, 17:22
6: Dec 2, 11:48
7: Dec 2, 08:21
8: Dec 1, 17:33
9: Dec 1, 11:23
10: Nov 30, 15:54
11: Nov 30, 09:41
12: Nov 29, 16:44
13: Nov 29, 08:01
14: Nov 28, 16:19
15: Nov 28, 09:42
16: Nov 27, 18:07
17: Nov 27, 12:04
18: Nov 27, 08:26
19: Nov 26, 18:06
20: Nov 26, 12:05
Posts: 161
vetoed the sweeping defense bill, which passed both chambers with veto-proof majorities. -- (link)
Posted by
mud
Dec 23 '20, 12:21
(No message)
https://twitter.com/kaitlancollins/status/1341840242245054466
(twitter.com)
Responses:
I WILL NOT BE IGNORED, MITCH! -- nm
-
mara
Dec 23, 12:41
1
ha! -- nm
-
🦌sleighformojo🛷
Dec 23, 12:48
what was his issue with that one? (I haven't followed) -- nm
-
ty97
Dec 23, 12:23
13
It did not repeal a legal shield for social media companies. -- nm*
-
🎅Spawnta🎅
Dec 23, 12:24
12
why on earth? -- nm
-
ty97
Dec 23, 12:25
11
The highlight is if this happened, his shitty user base would be booted by a corporate suit before they could start any shit. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Dec 23, 12:31
1
yup. Someone told him he "wants" this, and he hasn't been able to shake the 500 reasons it would be awful for everyone. -- nm
-
Reagen
Dec 23, 12:46
that reason is pure nonsense. Its a loyalty test. Thats all this is. -- nm
-
Jovian
Dec 23, 12:27
he wants revenge on Twitter for labeling his posts. -- nm
-
Reagen
Dec 23, 12:26
7
no, I get that. I mean why do **WE** want the social media shield? -- nm
-
ty97
Dec 23, 12:27
6
Because if social media companies could be sued for what you wrote there would be *more* censorship not less. -- nm*
-
spamlet
Dec 23, 13:06
(And it's not just for social media companies, but he wants it removed specifically for them) -- nm
-
Reagen
Dec 23, 12:42
Free exchange of ideas, these places aren’t thought police ...
-
Will Hunting
Dec 23, 12:33
2
also I think it allows them to be thought police, so they can't be sued for blocking propaganda bs. -- nm
-
Max
Dec 23, 12:41
1
That’s what the misinformation is. You can read 230 yourself and see what is says. -- (link)
-
spamlet
Dec 23, 13:11
So sites like Slackertalk can keep running. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Dec 23, 12:32
more -- (link)
-
mud
Dec 23, 12:22
*blink* wow -- nm
-
JaxSean
Dec 23, 12:22
4
Some men just want to watch the world burn. -- nm
-
🎅Spawnta🎅
Dec 23, 12:24
3
oh: defense bill. I thought he vetoed the COVID Relief Bill -- nm
-
JaxSean
Dec 23, 12:26
2
Wait for it... -- nm
-
🎅Spawnta🎅
Dec 23, 12:27
1
exactly -- nm
-
Jovian
Dec 23, 12:29
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.