ST Alpha - "It did not repeal a legal shield for social media companies. -- nm*" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 161

In response to "what was his issue with that one? (I haven't followed) -- nm" by ty97

It did not repeal a legal shield for social media companies. -- nm*

Posted by 🎅Spawnta🎅 (aka Spawn) Dec 23 '20, 12:24

(No message)

Responses:

why on earth? -- nm - ty97 Dec 23, 12:25 11
- The highlight is if this happened, his shitty user base would be booted by a corporate suit before they could start any shit. -- nm - Will Hunting Dec 23, 12:31 1
  - yup. Someone told him he "wants" this, and he hasn't been able to shake the 500 reasons it would be awful for everyone. -- nm - Reagen Dec 23, 12:46
- that reason is pure nonsense. Its a loyalty test. Thats all this is. -- nm - Jovian Dec 23, 12:27
- he wants revenge on Twitter for labeling his posts. -- nm - Reagen Dec 23, 12:26 7
  - no, I get that. I mean why do **WE** want the social media shield? -- nm - ty97 Dec 23, 12:27 6
    - Because if social media companies could be sued for what you wrote there would be *more* censorship not less. -- nm* - spamlet Dec 23, 13:06
    - (And it's not just for social media companies, but he wants it removed specifically for them) -- nm - Reagen Dec 23, 12:42
    - Free exchange of ideas, these places aren’t thought police ... - Will Hunting Dec 23, 12:33 2
      - also I think it allows them to be thought police, so they can't be sued for blocking propaganda bs. -- nm - Max Dec 23, 12:41 1
        
        That’s what the misinformation is. You can read 230 yourself and see what is says. -- (link) - spamlet Dec 23, 13:11
    - So sites like Slackertalk can keep running. -- nm - Beryllium Dec 23, 12:32

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.