Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 11, 14:43
2: Dec 11, 11:29
3: Dec 11, 07:59
4: Dec 10, 18:15
5: Dec 10, 12:28
6: Dec 10, 09:30
7: Dec 10, 05:59
8: Dec 9, 17:07
9: Dec 9, 13:47
10: Dec 9, 10:33
11: Dec 9, 07:33
12: Dec 8, 17:50
13: Dec 8, 10:32
14: Dec 8, 06:23
15: Dec 7, 16:52
16: Dec 7, 07:17
17: Dec 6, 14:40
18: Dec 6, 10:07
19: Dec 6, 07:32
20: Dec 5, 19:48
Posts: 161
In response to
"
he wants revenge on Twitter for labeling his posts. -- nm
"
by
Reagen
no, I get that. I mean why do **WE** want the social media shield? -- nm
Posted by
ty97
Dec 23 '20, 12:27
(No message)
Responses:
Because if social media companies could be sued for what you wrote there would be *more* censorship not less. -- nm*
-
spamlet
Dec 23, 13:06
(And it's not just for social media companies, but he wants it removed specifically for them) -- nm
-
Reagen
Dec 23, 12:42
Free exchange of ideas, these places aren’t thought police ...
-
Will Hunting
Dec 23, 12:33
2
also I think it allows them to be thought police, so they can't be sued for blocking propaganda bs. -- nm
-
Max
Dec 23, 12:41
1
That’s what the misinformation is. You can read 230 yourself and see what is says. -- (link)
-
spamlet
Dec 23, 13:11
So sites like Slackertalk can keep running. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Dec 23, 12:32
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.