Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 09:36
2: Dec 4, 02:38
3: Dec 3, 14:19
4: Dec 3, 11:17
5: Dec 3, 07:33
6: Dec 2, 17:22
7: Dec 2, 11:48
8: Dec 2, 08:21
9: Dec 1, 17:33
10: Dec 1, 11:23
11: Nov 30, 15:54
12: Nov 30, 09:41
13: Nov 29, 16:44
14: Nov 29, 08:01
15: Nov 28, 16:19
16: Nov 28, 09:42
17: Nov 27, 18:07
18: Nov 27, 12:04
19: Nov 27, 08:26
20: Nov 26, 18:06
Posts: 153
This is the 2nd story I’ve seen at NYT about the consequences of high schoolers posted stuff on Snapchat in a week. -- (link*)
Posted by
Mop (aka rburriel)
Dec 28 '20, 13:15
(No message)
Glad to see NYT picked a lane. In this case... can a school discipline a student who bitched about school via Snapchat?
(www.nytimes.com)
Responses:
Haven't read the article, but "Badmouthed?" No.
-
JaxSean
Dec 28, 13:41
Here’s the other story. A girl in a Virginia high school made a racist post on Snapchat. A boy who saw it bided his time then dropped the bomb. -- (link)
-
Mop
Dec 28, 13:18
4
so she wasn't able to go to the college of choice....but do we really want to destroy a kids life over something said as a tween? -- nm
-
zeitgeist
Dec 28, 14:10
Subscription required. And I will not subscribe to the Times, they are exploitative trash.
-
Beryllium
Dec 28, 13:22
2
reader mode. -- nm
-
Reagen
Dec 28, 14:51
I don't read very many of their opinion pieces (or anyone's really.) -- nm
-
Qale
Dec 28, 14:49
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.