Backboards: 
Posts: 156
In response to "here -- (link)" by Reagen

God, this reminds me of so many law school discussions. The University of Chicago was (and probably still is) the hub of the law and economics theory

Everything was essentially economics based and it would cause behaviors that obviated the need for government interference. But I always argued that it was (a) backwards looking to explain past changes but much less effective forward looking because of the difference in available information, and (b) assumes, like most economics arguments, completely rational behavior, which rarely occurs consistently without rules and regulations that limit irrational behavior. Fortunately, while they never agreed with me, they did like a debate, so it didn't hurt me.

Responses:
Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.