Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 12:27
2: Dec 4, 09:36
3: Dec 4, 02:38
4: Dec 3, 14:19
5: Dec 3, 11:17
6: Dec 3, 07:33
7: Dec 2, 17:22
8: Dec 2, 11:48
9: Dec 2, 08:21
10: Dec 1, 17:33
11: Dec 1, 11:23
12: Nov 30, 15:54
13: Nov 30, 09:41
14: Nov 29, 16:44
15: Nov 29, 08:01
16: Nov 28, 16:19
17: Nov 28, 09:42
18: Nov 27, 18:07
19: Nov 27, 12:04
20: Nov 27, 08:26
Posts: 158
I don't know if this is a fair question to ask, but shouldn't the Capitol Police done a better job of preparing for this? -- nm
Posted by
prayformojo (aka mayhem)
Jan 6 '21, 11:59
(No message)
Responses:
Devil's advocate: nobody's been shot yet. Imagine a scenario if police had decided to shoot to protect the property.
-
Max
Jan 6, 12:02
5
that's a pretty extreme leap -- nm
-
prayformojo
Jan 6, 12:05
2
I have to think that was part of the calculus in setting rules of engagement. -- nm
-
Max
Jan 6, 12:07
1
agreed, but certainly there were measures they could put in place that didn't involve gunfire -- nm
-
prayformojo
Jan 6, 12:08
Yes.
-
Will Hunting
Jan 6, 12:04
1
There sure were a hell of a lot more clouds of gas to push back the BLM protests. I haven't seen more than a wisp of spray today. -- nm
-
Max
Jan 6, 12:05
I'm a bit surprised the NG wasn't already on stand by and in place. -- (edited)
-
sycor
Jan 6, 12:01
6
DC's Mayor mobilized the National Guard yesterday. They're here. -- nm
-
David
Jan 6, 12:03
2
Not sure they are able to be deployed on federal property though, they were supposed to be helping direct traffic. -- (edited)
-
znufrii
Jan 6, 12:04
1
Yes, that's correct. They're not allowed to use weapons per the decree. -- nm
-
David
Jan 6, 12:06
Capitol building is federal property, so they’d have to be federalized to be deployed, and guess who they’d report to? -- nm
-
znufrii
Jan 6, 12:03
1
Fair enough. I guess I never realized they couldn't be deployed on federal property. Makes sense though. But so then why weren't they there to keep
-
sycor
Jan 6, 12:07
yeah exactly. can anyone but him mobilize the NG? -- nm
-
amanda jeans
Jan 6, 12:02
They probably did and this is being "overreported" -- nm
-
con_carne
Jan 6, 12:01
Who knew that this could happen?? (NM)
-
Marlowe
Jan 6, 12:00
5
HELLO -- nm
-
Jovian s.i.
Jan 6, 12:02
2
Heh. -- nm
-
Strongbad
Jan 6, 12:30
Heh. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jan 6, 12:03
Anyone paying even the slightest bit of attention? -- nm
-
Cuzzin Todd
Jan 6, 12:01
1
Nah, those are real Americans, peace-loving folk who are all about law and order. (NM)
-
Marlowe
Jan 6, 12:02
It’s an entirely fair question to ask. -- nm
-
znufrii
Jan 6, 12:00
2
And everyone knows the answer. Stop pretending this is some freak incident. -- (edited)
-
Shaun
Jan 6, 12:03
1
Agreed. I think we’re all just asking rhetorical questions here. -- nm*
-
znufrii
Jan 6, 12:09
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.