ST Alpha - "I'd argue that a straight guy isn't going to have sex with a guy *on camera* for free." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 154

I'd argue that a straight guy isn't going to have sex with a guy on camera for free.

Posted by mafic Jun 25 '09, 06:32

I know a couple guys that have had sex with men (for free) not particularly enjoyed it, and continued on with women. men who I - and virtually everyone else - would define as being straight. they just viewed it as "I'll try anything once."

and $1500 is a lot of money for some people, especially for an hour's work. I think it comes down to different attitudes about sexuality in the end. having sex for money doesn't define your sexuality, it's about your need/desire for money.

Responses:

It's funny to wake up, shower, eat breakfast, and then log on to see we are on this same topic. - Redmond Jun 25, 07:02
I'm serious, peeps ... this is the entire premise of Humpday! -- nm - secretslacker Jun 25, 06:45
I also think once you get to the point where you're going to do it on camera to be put online, you're already outside average boundaries anyway. - Dano Jun 25, 06:42 20
- i disagree - marcel Jun 25, 06:46
- I don't know why it's such a debate... Everybody has a price for just about everything IMO. -- nm - Cuzzin Todd Jun 25, 06:43 18
  - The key to your statement is "just about everything" not everything. - Redmond Jun 25, 07:12
  - *gives Dignan a nickel, wonders what he will do* -- nm - Beaker Jun 25, 06:48 3
    - He'll be dancin' for hours! -- nm - Cuzzin Todd Jun 25, 06:56
    - [deleted]
    - anyting you like. nm -- nm - groiny, so horny Jun 25, 06:49
  - Yeah, some people value the money more than their standard sexuality. - Will Hunting Jun 25, 06:47 1
    - it's not like female hookers are having sex with male customers because it's 'sexually appealing' to them. - Andie Jun 25, 06:48
  - [deleted] 10
    - "Price" isn't limited to monetary reward necessarily. -- nm - Cuzzin Todd Jun 25, 06:59
    - My point wasn't that it was universal. My point is that once you've taken that step, other steps probably aren't as "out there" as some people think. -- nm - Dano Jun 25, 06:56
    - i think it's easy for any of us to say that being as we aren't desperate for money. - Andie Jun 25, 06:49 6
      - there are lines I wouldn't cross, but they're not exactly things people would pay me to do anyway. - mafic Jun 25, 06:54
      - [deleted] 3
        
        i really really doubt that. - Andie Jun 25, 06:55 1
        
        like every hypothetical situation, I do not believe most of the answers people give. - groiny Jun 25, 06:58
        
        you had me at hello. nm -- nm - groiny Jun 25, 06:55
      - it's all about motivation - marcel Jun 25, 06:51
    - how much for the wife and kids? nm -- nm - groiny Jun 25, 06:48
Related to your post on B2 about strippers...I'm wondering if straight girls will do that more - Jim Jun 25, 06:37 2
- yeah, I think that's all a big part of it. -- nm - mafic Jun 25, 06:39
- "Pibb Ramblings" would make a good name -- nm - prayformojo Jun 25, 06:39
(actually, there are probably a lot of gay guys that wouldn't have sex with a man on camera for free). - mafic Jun 25, 06:34 3
- I would not have sex with a woman on camera let alone a guy...unless its Drew Barrymore or my mortgage is being paid off!! - Walt_Disney Jun 25, 06:48
- I actually wonder if the "on camera to be put online" is the bigger boundary to cross. -- nm - Dano Jun 25, 06:43
- FWIW, my wife is the only person I'd have sex on camera with for free. nm - Jim Jun 25, 06:38
~/Baby did a bad bad thing/~ -- nm - 'lia Jun 25, 06:33

Post a message top

I'd argue that a straight guy isn't going to have sex with a guy *on camera* for free.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.

I'd argue that a straight guy isn't going to have sex with a guy on camera for free.