ST Alpha - "That's unreasonably mean, imo. " (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 160

In response to "This is obviously not a guy you'd really want to be monogomous with anyway. "Thanks for validating my choice," I'd say. -- nm" by mara

That's unreasonably mean, imo.

Posted by musubi Jun 25 '09, 12:57

He wants more out of the relationship than she does. It's no unreasonable for either of them, but clearly it's gonna end. Just rip off the band-aid and get it over with.

Responses:

It's not just that he wants more out of the relationship. It's that he's concluding she wants to sleep around. -- nm - mara Jun 25, 13:01 5
- Put yourself in his shoes, wouldn't that seem like a pretty fair interpretation for him to make? - musubi Jun 25, 13:03 4
  - No. (And in fact he hasn't just gotten broken up with.) -- nm - mara Jun 25, 13:06 3
    - Telling someone that expects monogomy, that you won't be monogomous, is the equivalent of being dumped. - musubi Jun 25, 13:08 2
      - Take my word for it. Hotkiss has not yet broken up with him. -- nm - mara Jun 25, 13:08 1
        
        well, they need to "be friends" and "hang out". -- nm - loosilu Jun 25, 13:10
Actually, unnecessarily mean, rather than unreasonably. (nm) - musubi Jun 25, 12:59

Post a message top

That's unreasonably mean, imo.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.