Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 08:01
2: Nov 28, 16:19
3: Nov 28, 09:42
4: Nov 27, 18:07
5: Nov 27, 12:04
6: Nov 27, 08:26
7: Nov 26, 18:06
8: Nov 26, 12:05
9: Nov 26, 08:29
10: Nov 25, 18:33
11: Nov 25, 11:12
12: Nov 25, 07:08
13: Nov 24, 13:17
14: Nov 23, 18:13
15: Nov 23, 06:17
16: Nov 22, 13:24
17: Nov 22, 09:09
18: Nov 21, 22:36
19: Nov 21, 14:03
20: Nov 21, 10:18
Posts: 153
I posted this on Twitter but didn't get many responses. Why is MJ the King of Pop, Elvis is the King of Rock, but McCartney is the cute beatle? -- nm
Posted by
loosilu (aka loosilu2)
Jun 25 '09, 19:02
(No message)
Responses:
After giving it some thought, I think Paul is unclassifiable. Nobody's done what he's done. -- nm
-
mara
Jun 25, 19:13
2
same is true of the other three, though. -- nm
-
loosilu
Jun 25, 19:16
1
OK, but let's be real: Elvis and Michael *singlehandedly* changed the entire landscape of music.
-
TFox
Jun 25, 19:19
but Paul was not the front of the band, they were an ensemble, plus they only did pop in the first half of the 60s -- nm
-
zork
Jun 25, 19:12
Because the Beatles were the Beatles. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Jun 25, 19:02
1
*obvious ding* -- nm
-
TFox
Jun 25, 19:03
I think it has more to do with the people who gave them the nicknames. -- nm
-
Remlik
Jun 25, 19:02
2
who came up with King of Pop anyway? -- nm
-
loosilu
Jun 25, 19:03
1
Apparently Elizabeth Taylor. -- (link)
-
mara
Jun 25, 19:07
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
