Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 12, 13:06
2: Dec 12, 08:55
3: Dec 11, 23:59
4: Dec 11, 14:43
5: Dec 11, 11:29
6: Dec 11, 07:59
7: Dec 10, 18:15
8: Dec 10, 12:28
9: Dec 10, 09:30
10: Dec 10, 05:59
11: Dec 9, 17:07
12: Dec 9, 13:47
13: Dec 9, 10:33
14: Dec 9, 07:33
15: Dec 8, 17:50
16: Dec 8, 10:32
17: Dec 8, 06:23
18: Dec 7, 16:52
19: Dec 7, 07:17
20: Dec 6, 14:40
Posts: 152
In response to
"
Kind of has an "all lives matter" feel to it to me.
"
by
Dark Callisto
Maybe I read this wrong, but would my using "Mr." be different than my using "he/him"? -- nm
Posted by
Spawn
Mar 31 '21, 11:30
(No message)
Responses:
I guess it’s fine if you expect people to refer to you with a formal honorific... -- (edited)
-
znufrii
Mar 31, 11:35
he/him is common language. you aren't referred to as "Mr." that often. they aren't interchangeable -- nm
-
Andie
Mar 31, 11:33
22
I think I just realized what throws me off about labeling myself as he/him - it sounds like I'm talking about someone else.
-
Max
Mar 31, 11:47
10
You’re pointing at the wrong question. It’s how you want to be referred not, not how you want to be addressed. -- nm
-
znufrii
Mar 31, 11:54
8
I *think* he is saying what I am saying. By choosing Mr. Spawn, I am saying he/him. -- nm
-
Spawn
Mar 31, 11:58
7
this. This just makes sense. "He/him" looks clunky and makes me have to pause a sec and calculate what's going on. -- nm
-
Max
Mar 31, 12:03
1
I am one that is usually in the camp of *not* reinventing the wheel. -- nm
-
Spawn
Mar 31, 12:10
And that’s probably fine to indicate by implication, but comes across to me as a bit formal for common usage. -- nm
-
znufrii
Mar 31, 12:01
4
I meant for the purposes of an email signature. -- nm
-
Spawn
Mar 31, 12:09
3
Again, seems a bit formal. -- nm
-
znufrii
Mar 31, 12:19
2
vs aesthetics of adding a Pronouns line -- nm
-
Spawn
Mar 31, 12:23
1
Which has nothing to do with formality as I see it, that’s just providing additional information. -- nm
-
znufrii
Mar 31, 12:33
Yeah, as I said, simple. -- nm
-
Spawn
Mar 31, 11:48
Okay. I just thought it more easily stated what pronouns I chose. But I guess there is no easy to this one. Thanks. -- nm
-
Spawn
Mar 31, 11:39
i know a few people that do he/him/they/them.. some people use multiple.
-
colin
Mar 31, 11:34
9
That seems excessive. -- nm
-
znufrii
Mar 31, 11:52
1
knowing them, it seems right though.. -- nm
-
colin
Mar 31, 12:19
If you're going he+they, shouldn't you logically go "he/him/she/her/they/them"? -- nm
-
Max
Mar 31, 11:49
I always took that as they prefer "they/them," but if it's not possible go with masculine. Is there a gender neutral word for Aunt/Uncle for example?
-
Dano
Mar 31, 11:39
5
I call my sister's child my "nibling." -- nm
-
Dark Callisto
Mar 31, 11:46
4
(So pibling instead of Aunt/Uncle?) -- nm
-
Dark Callisto
Mar 31, 11:48
3
Ancle? Unt? -- nm
-
znufrii
Mar 31, 11:58
2
So what about grandma/grandpa? -- nm
-
Spawn
Mar 31, 11:59
1
Grandy -- nm
-
Dark Callisto
Mar 31, 12:06
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.