ST Alpha - "I don't think that's it (in a broader sense), though I could be wrong. I don't think the purchaser gains access to any revenues from the use of the " (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

In response to "Jokes aside, I've been trying to distill the answer of "What is an NFT?" for a while, and isn't it just the copyright to a digital item?" by Mop

I don't think that's it (in a broader sense), though I could be wrong. I don't think the purchaser gains access to any revenues from the use of the

Posted by pmb (aka pmb) Apr 29 '21, 07:37

image going forward. Just the one specific "first" image. So I think it's more like buying a painting. The artist can still make prints and sell them, but the purchaser owns the original painting. It's just that in this case it's not physical and is indistinguishable (other than by the blockchain) from any other production of the print.

Responses:

I also believe this to be correct, unless otherwise specifically expressed in the sale. -- nm - JaxSean Apr 29, 08:17
Well, if that's the case, that's extra stupid. So "Disaster Girl" still holds the right to revenue from her famous photograph? -- nm - Mop Apr 29, 07:52 1
- As far as I know (not that I think she actually sees revenue from people using it in a meme). -- nm - pmb Apr 29, 07:58

Post a message top

I don't think that's it (in a broader sense), though I could be wrong. I don't think the purchaser gains access to any revenues from the use of the

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.