|
In response to
"The Mustang name survived the gas crisis 70's versions of the car: Mustang II with their < 90 HP four cylinder engines -- nm"
by
JD
|
At least those had a resemblance to what a Mustang should be. This is a sort of SUV that in no way looks like a Mustang. There's no reason
Posted by
Krusty (aka Krustylu)
May 3 '21, 10:28
|
to put the Mustang name on this vehicle.
I don't care if it's a great SUV, it's an SUV and not a Mustang. It's not a muscle car and it's not a sports car.
It should have its own name and not considered a Mustang.
|
Responses:
|