ST Alpha - "Obviously vetting cumulative swears is too cumbersome -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 159

In response to "it's sensoring cum regardless of it's part of another word -- nm" by ty97

Obviously vetting cumulative swears is too cumbersome -- nm

Posted by Roger More (aka RogerMore) Jun 28 '09, 20:49

(No message)

Responses:

So we need to figure all the possible variations. See how many words we can get censored in a single post :) - MojaveMeg Jun 28, 20:52 9
- [deleted]
- way ahead of you. -- (link) - mafic Jun 28, 21:00 1
  - Hee. /resisting LOL :) -- nm - MojaveMeg Jun 28, 21:03
- Perhaps there's a way of circumventing the swear blocker? -- nm - Roger More Jun 28, 20:56 5
  - +1 Qale Point -- nm - Qale Jun 28, 23:48
  - Is there a standard profanity blocking matrix? Do we know which words are generally blocked? -- nm - MojaveMeg Jun 28, 20:58 1
    - How many dirty words does D.Mac know? -- nm - Roger More Jun 28, 21:00
  - I haven't tried d o c u m e n t or anything like that -- nm - ty97 Jun 28, 20:57 1
    - I believe I saw someone repost with dashes between the letters -- nm - MojaveMeg Jun 28, 21:01
*seethes* -- nm - ACUMM Jun 28, 20:50 1
- *points and laughs* -- nm - ADICK Jun 28, 20:52

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.