ST Alpha - "If it's not for you that's fine (though I'd question when you tried it, pre or post Wastelanders) but I don't get why you find their " (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 165

In response to "I've played it and it's not what I want in a Fallout game. -- nm" by Krusty

If it's not for you that's fine (though I'd question when you tried it, pre or post Wastelanders) but I don't get why you find their

Posted by Cuzzin Todd (aka cuzzintodd) Jun 14 '21, 05:51

continued support of it "disappointing."

If it's because you want FO5, when 76 launched that was at minimum of a decade away - Starfield was their announced next game (3-5 years) and then they'd already let it be known Elder Scrolls 6 was after that (another 3-5 years). That's 2028 or beyond. And technically we don't even know if a FO5 had begun beginning development yet, so maybe longer.

I'd love it if the Microsoft purchase accelerates that timeline. But who knows if it will.

Responses:

That they chose to make Fallout76 instead of doing Fallout 5 annoys me. That's they're choice to make though. I'm disappointed in what the game is and because of that -- (edited) - Krusty Jun 14, 05:57 2
- No, that's not really how it played out. FO76 was really essentially built as an expansion of fo4 with minimal extra development work. It started as - Cuzzin Todd Jun 14, 06:02 1
  - Things aren't looking good though. They've got two games ahead of it right now and so I'm not sure how they can work on three games at once. - Krusty Jun 14, 06:07

Post a message top

If it's not for you that's fine (though I'd question when you tried it, pre or post Wastelanders) but I don't get why you find their

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.