Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 156
Given all the licensed properties that LEGO has had sets for, I'm honestly shocked they've never had Star Trek sets.
Posted by
TWuG
Jul 5 '21, 12:50
It may be that the licensing fee would be on par with the Star Wars fees and having two properties with that fee structure isn't viable, but I'd love me some LEGO Star Trek.
Responses:
because they signed with Mega Blocks -- nm
-
Remlik
Jul 5, 13:02
2
So did DC. I still have my Batmobile. But they are with LEGO, now. -- nm
-
Spawn
Jul 5, 15:33
Mega Blocks is where licenses temporarily go until a deal can be made with Lego. -- nm
-
Mop, Montreal Canadiens Fan
Jul 5, 13:31
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.