Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 157
In response to
"
Why not web? Web = desktop. Plus you eliminate having to support/upgrade desktop installs when making changes. -- nm
"
by
oblique
It’s all local…?
Posted by
Will Hunting (aka JoeMetz)
Aug 3 '21, 09:16
I’m talking a large local database; don’t want to really crush performance? I dunno… what would work for that? JS or Python?
Responses:
Bery would probably know better. Web doesn't have to mean online to the world. Just as a UI -- nm
-
oblique
Aug 3, 09:19
4
Ok, are we saying JS/Python? I don’t really like Php as an option. I’m replacing the Access stuff. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Aug 3, 09:43
1
javascript won't do it. python has an odbc api that might work (you'd have to do some research) -- nm
-
decline
Aug 3, 09:44
Yeah, I run PHP locally all the time - and depending on the intent of the database, it could be a stepping stone to making it more widely accessible.
-
Beryllium
Aug 3, 09:33
1
(Also, php's way of accessing Access might not be the most exercised corner of the language ...) -- nm
-
Beryllium
Aug 3, 09:34
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.