Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 161
In response to
"
i should be able to privately send email without mass surveillance. if full privacy is the only alternative to mass surveillance, that's fine. -- nm
"
by
chicken daddy
encrypt your emails, privately -- nm
Posted by
oblique (aka kkuphal)
Aug 3 '21, 13:15
(No message)
Responses:
i've been telling the young anarchists/revolutionaries i know to do this.. host their own messaging platforms. but they're not too tech goodly :( -- nm
-
chicken daddy
Aug 3, 13:17
4
I'm genuinely surprised that as a proponent of this you would be against bitcoin as a store of value and/or means of transfer of value. Those two
-
oblique
Aug 3, 13:21
3
bitcoin is straight burning oil. nanocoin is my crypto of choice. -- nm
-
chicken daddy
Aug 3, 13:26
2
also why would i trust a currency that's dominated and manipulated by billionaires? that's insane -- nm
-
chicken daddy
Aug 3, 13:27
1
yet you say Nano is better when it is Proof of Stake where voting is controlled by % of ownership, not by cryptography. Not talking about the *price*
-
oblique
Aug 3, 13:38
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
