|
In response to
"also why would i trust a currency that's dominated and manipulated by billionaires? that's insane -- nm"
by
chicken daddy
|
yet you say Nano is better when it is Proof of Stake where voting is controlled by % of ownership, not by cryptography. Not talking about the *price*
Posted by
oblique (aka kkuphal)
Aug 3 '21, 13:38
|
of a coin, but how the blockchain actually functions. You can't "control" bitcoin unless you control 51% of the hashrate (power) of the network. Nano, you just have to have 51% of the coins. I'd be more concerned about who is holding the keys to the network than any potential market/price manipulation.
|