Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 159
In response to
"
I await the Supreme Court weighing in “Did we f**king stutter?” -- nm
"
by
Will Hunting
I'm pretty sure the strategy here is just to delay because Congress didn't vote. -- nm
Posted by
Dano (aka dano)
Aug 4 '21, 07:10
(No message)
Responses:
Because they don't have the votes to pass it. -- nm
-
Baron of the Rings
Aug 4, 07:19
2
Hence-"Nothing was going to get done in the House to help people. So the WH acted. It's only temporary, but it is something." -- nm
-
Diva
Aug 4, 07:43
1
There's a really interesting philosophical question there. Should the WH do something it itself has said it is not legally permitted to do?
-
Baron of the Rings
Aug 4, 08:13
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.