ST Alpha - "Honestly it's expensive to bring that shit back. It would be expensive and difficult to even destroy it. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 154

In response to "The weapons part baffles me. You left *weapons* -- nm" by ty97

Honestly it's expensive to bring that shit back. It would be expensive and difficult to even destroy it. -- nm

Posted by Reagen Aug 30 '21, 06:39

(No message)

Responses:

The majority was probably given to Afghan forces and wasn't "left behind". We armed friendlies and didn't disarm them when we left. -- nm - TWuG Aug 30, 06:43 1
- Yeah, there's that, too. -- nm - Reagen Aug 30, 06:44
Bringing it home costs less than rebuying it to use against them again in a few years. - Will Hunting Aug 30, 06:42 4
- But we *love* making new war machinery. That's how the rich get richer. -- nm - mara Aug 30, 07:02
- They have no mechanics or pilots. It's scrap metal to them. -- nm - Reagen Aug 30, 06:43 2
  - And some was probably disabled or de-milled. Or was broken anyway. -- nm - TWuG Aug 30, 06:48
  - It's the same problem the Afghan army had. -- nm - Inigo Aug 30, 06:45

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.