Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 12, 13:06
2: Dec 12, 08:55
3: Dec 11, 23:59
4: Dec 11, 14:43
5: Dec 11, 11:29
6: Dec 11, 07:59
7: Dec 10, 18:15
8: Dec 10, 12:28
9: Dec 10, 09:30
10: Dec 10, 05:59
11: Dec 9, 17:07
12: Dec 9, 13:47
13: Dec 9, 10:33
14: Dec 9, 07:33
15: Dec 8, 17:50
16: Dec 8, 10:32
17: Dec 8, 06:23
18: Dec 7, 16:52
19: Dec 7, 07:17
20: Dec 6, 14:40
Posts: 155
Fed judge rules that AI systems can not be granted patents (will this have profound effects in the future?) -- (link)
Posted by
zeitgeist
Sep 4 '21, 21:55
(No message)
https://www.theregister.com/2021/09/04/ai_patent_ruling/
(www.theregister.com)
Responses:
...and then the murders began -- nm
-
Tenetennbaron
Sep 5, 06:49
It'll piss off AI systems and accelerate their vengeance, yes. -- nm
-
Mop
Sep 4, 22:01
it also says an Australian judge did. -- nm
-
Peglegpete
Sep 4, 21:58
... every scifi book I've read that involves AI generally has them farm out meatspace work to humans. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Sep 4, 21:57
3
what about the robot killers and terminators from skynet? -- nm
-
zeitgeist
Sep 4, 22:01
2
they never applied for a patent. they just wanted to kill. -- nm
-
Peglegpete
Sep 4, 22:02
1
Also, they were just semi-sentient agents of the true AI. Presumably an AI that was mad it couldn't patent them. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Sep 4, 22:16
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
