Backboards: 
Posts: 165
In response to "Yes, same as ending the filibuster on judges. The Dems lifted almost all of the restrictions and he greatly benefited from that. " by spamlet

He ended it for the Supreme Court. If it suits him he doesn't care. He doesn't particularly care about it for other things because he doesn't really

care about governing. It's the courts he cares about. Yes, he will use removal of the filibuster for his benefit, but he's also using the filibuster for his benefit. So what are we protecting. I'm actually ok with a limited filibuster, but it should be very limited. Only able to be used on matters that are "lay down on the railroad tracks" kind of issues.

Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.