In response to
"That's a very paternalistic way of framing it. "Control themselves"? "
by
Name Withheld By Request
|
I think you're mixing up definitions of the word threat in this thread (completely accidentally, I mean). You're saying "this is a looming problem."
Posted by
Beryllium (aka grayman)
Sep 17 '21, 14:30
|
Andie and the rest of us are saying it reads specifically like "Vote for us *or else*".
If they can't get votes without a threat of something worse happening, then they need to get in the sea of irrelevancy.
But *observing* that there is a looming threat is different.
At least that's my read on the conversation so far. I could be rambling nonsensically.
|
Responses:
|