Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 18:10
2: Dec 4, 12:27
3: Dec 4, 09:36
4: Dec 4, 02:38
5: Dec 3, 14:19
6: Dec 3, 11:17
7: Dec 3, 07:33
8: Dec 2, 17:22
9: Dec 2, 11:48
10: Dec 2, 08:21
11: Dec 1, 17:33
12: Dec 1, 11:23
13: Nov 30, 15:54
14: Nov 30, 09:41
15: Nov 29, 16:44
16: Nov 29, 08:01
17: Nov 28, 16:19
18: Nov 28, 09:42
19: Nov 27, 18:07
20: Nov 27, 12:04
Posts: 194
In response to
"
See, your words sound reasonable. Your original quote (not yours), less so. -- nm*
"
by
Andie
Yes, this is where I land as well. -- nm
Posted by
Beryllium (aka grayman)
Sep 17 '21, 14:37
(No message)
Responses:
Guys, with respect, it’s an op-Ed headline. -- nm
-
Name Withheld by Request
Sep 17, 14:44
4
I ... don't know what that means for this discussion. That it was a waste of time and we should have ignored it? -- nm
-
Beryllium
Sep 17, 14:46
3
Just that it is by design meant to be a provocative quote. It’s the idea is embedded in the piece that now. -- nm
-
Name Withheld by Request
Sep 17, 14:51
2
I understand the first part, but the second part word not sense make -- nm
-
Beryllium
Sep 17, 14:55
1
Was using voice. Sorry. My point is that the headline is not how the piece shows be judged. -- nm
-
Name Withheld by Request
Sep 17, 14:59
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
