ST Alpha - "Recently, rookie QBs have done way better than what Wilson, Fields and Lawrence are showing. Lance gets a pass since he's only at one start. -- (edited)" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 160

In response to "I would have guessed because the teams they play on aren't filled with talent and they're rookies. Most suck in their first year." by Krusty

Recently, rookie QBs have done way better than what Wilson, Fields and Lawrence are showing. Lance gets a pass since he's only at one start. -- (edited)

Posted by Inigo (aka Inigo) Oct 28 '21, 06:44

Murray, Allen, Burrow, Herbert, Mayfield, Watson, Jones all had better records and stats then Wilson, Fields and Lawrence. Hell, even Tua did better.

For as much as people said Lamar couldn't throw his rookie year, these rookie would kill for his record and passing stats. Not to mention the record setting rushing.

The only recent first round QBs that has looked as bad as them Josh Rosen and Sam Darnold. Darnold explains why you think all rookies are this bad. ;)

Added: Manning did throw 28 INTs back in 1998. He also threw for 26 TDs. But that was back in 1998. 23 years ago, rookie QBs took a lot longer to develop, and were given time to do so. Not so much anymore.

Responses:

Every situation is different with what some of those QB's had/have around them. I have a hard time judging QB's in the first year. -- (edited) - Krusty Oct 28, 06:52 2
- Like I said in the original post, I do think rookie need time to develop. Unfortunately, NFL teams just aren't patient anymore... -- (edited) - Inigo Oct 28, 07:02 1
  - Aaron Rodgers sat for 3 years! Imagine that now. -- nm - Reagen Oct 28, 08:03

Post a message top

Recently, rookie QBs have done way better than what Wilson, Fields and Lawrence are showing. Lance gets a pass since he's only at one start. -- (edited)

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.