Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 11:23
2: Nov 30, 15:54
3: Nov 30, 09:41
4: Nov 29, 16:44
5: Nov 29, 08:01
6: Nov 28, 16:19
7: Nov 28, 09:42
8: Nov 27, 18:07
9: Nov 27, 12:04
10: Nov 27, 08:26
11: Nov 26, 18:06
12: Nov 26, 12:05
13: Nov 26, 08:29
14: Nov 25, 18:33
15: Nov 25, 11:12
16: Nov 25, 07:08
17: Nov 24, 13:17
18: Nov 23, 18:13
19: Nov 23, 06:17
20: Nov 22, 13:24
Posts: 161
In response to
"
Eternals 54% (90/78), Spencer 87% (80/12) -- nm
"
by
Beaker
Ok I'm starting to question those RT numbers
Posted by
eag (aka eag)
Nov 3 '21, 10:12
Something is up like its getting purposely bombed
Responses:
You know each number refers to a verified, written review, right?
-
Inigo
Nov 3, 10:19
3
Yes but as I posted below a 21% percent drop from its initial score
-
eag
Nov 3, 10:24
2
Like I said below, momentum for reviews works both ways.
-
Inigo
Nov 3, 10:27
1
I honestly could give a crap about RT scores
-
eag
Nov 3, 10:38
Or…and this is crazy, it’s just a middling movie. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Nov 3, 10:16
8
That is not what Disney and Marvel think. They had a Best Picture FYC ready. -- nm
-
Not Picard
Nov 3, 10:23
4
Alternatively; they seeded that thought in the media as a sign of propping up a film that needed good PR.
-
Will Hunting
Nov 3, 10:26
3
Dude, they were talking a Best Picture nod *last* fall. They looooove this movie. -- nm
-
Not Picard
Nov 3, 10:28
2
The PR said they were. Until they put money out, it’s PR. It’s interesting how you read the tea leaves for something but not others.
-
Will Hunting
Nov 3, 10:30
1
There was no PR at the time. This was 100% the internal thinking on Eternals. Execs believe it’s a masterpiece. -- nm
-
Not Picard
Nov 3, 10:33
Possibly but I don't think I've seen a movie take such a nose dive like this before it started at 75
-
eag
Nov 3, 10:20
2
75 isn’t that high a mark in its own right so any later review would trend it down into the meh range. It snowballed.
-
Will Hunting
Nov 3, 10:28
So, you think more than 100 established film critics are risking their reputation and jobs to intentionally tank a film that they know is good?
-
Inigo
Nov 3, 10:24
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.