ST Alpha - "Wimbledon spoilerish question" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 155

Wimbledon spoilerish question

Posted by Fuzzy (aka mrfuzzy) Jul 5 '09, 10:37

Do you think Federer is truly better than Sampras, McEnroe, Connor, etc.? Or has he been lucky enough to be dominant at a time when there isn't a clear rival to his ability?

And I really liked the Nike ad after the match.

Show Spoilers

Responses:

Spoilers - David Jul 5, 11:54
I think Sampras at his prime, woulda gotten Feds. -- nm - Buzz Jul 5, 10:49 2
- Maybe at Wimbledon, but overall.....Federer would take him on clay almost without question - Will Hunting Jul 5, 10:50 1
  - Clay definitely, Sampras just couldn't get it with clay, but grass, exluding that loss in 01. heh -- nm - Buzz Jul 5, 10:58
Yes. Reasons are he does have a foil and has won like 6 Slams in the Nadal 'era'. - Will Hunting Jul 5, 10:40
how do you measure that? (spoiler) - marcel Jul 5, 10:39
I think it was Scarlett johansson -- nm - Beryllium (iPhone) Jul 5, 10:38

Post a message top

Wimbledon spoilerish question

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.