Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 155
In response to
"
228-206
"
by
znufrii
Holy shit. They are objecting to the motion to reconsider being laid upon table. -- (edited)
Posted by
znufrii
Nov 5 '21, 20:29
I don't think I have ever seen that happen.
Responses:
In english now -- nm
-
ty97
Nov 5, 20:30
5
It's generally a routine matter after a bill is passed for a motion to reconsider the vote be tabled without objection. Republicans objected. -- (edited)
-
znufrii
Nov 5, 20:32
4
The bill passed, why are we tabling anything that's just silly -- nm
-
ty97
Nov 5, 20:34
3
tabling here means it will not be considered. the motion to reconsider is usually tabled as a routine matter. -- nm*
-
znufrii
Nov 5, 20:34
2
Wait we have to vote to not reconsider something we just considered? -- nm
-
ty97
Nov 5, 20:35
1
yup.
-
znufrii
Nov 5, 20:37
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
