Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 179
In response to
"
No logical reason, no. However, it sounds like the general consensus is that the individual states will not allow that to happen. -- nm
"
by
Beryllium
Which is crazy. Military? OK. Taxation? No problem, federalize it. Elections! WHOA, no way. (nm)
Posted by
musubi Voted For Change 2 weeks ago (aka musubi)
Nov 4 '08, 12:45
wha?
Responses:
actually, you know what? The National Guard is run by each state, and some states are VERY opposed to the fed taking over. -- nm
-
loosilu - I voted!
Nov 4, 12:46
4
,,,plus, states collect their own taxes. -- nm
-
loosilu - I voted!
Nov 4, 12:46
3
Noone said that state can't run parallel elections, but centralizing and simplifying the system for federal elections isn't a threat to states' rights
-
musubi Voted For Change 2 weeks ago
Nov 4, 12:51
so do provinces. doesn't really factor. -- nm
-
Andie
Nov 4, 12:48
1
right, but I'm saying it's not a good example. -- nm
-
loosilu - I voted!
Nov 4, 12:50
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
