Backboards: 
Posts: 165
In response to "I default to Federalist Paper #29. And Justice Stevens' dissent in DC v. Heller. -- (edited)" by ReluctantCynic

This is my thought, but there's also nothing to say they considered self-defense to be so obviously related that there was no reason to state it. -- nm

(No message)


Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.