ST want to help me with some fun conjecture? On my way home from camp on the 4th, I got rear ended by an industrial dump truck.
Posted by
TFox
Jul 6 '09, 07:29
|
It was in stop and go traffic, but basically the guy had pulled so close to me that he couldn't see my Escort over the nose of the truck, and tried to drive through the back of me twice. It was one of those big tri-axle things with a welded steel bumper, so you can imagine who won that battle. I could drive the car home, but the rear end is completely crumpled: trunk lid is destroyed, rear spoiler broke off the car, left rear brake light is toast, holes punctures in the left rear body of the car below the brake light, rear bumper damaged, etc.
It turns out the driver wasn't on official company business, but had borrowed the truck from his boss to do some work at his house. I took down all the information but the driver said his boss would likely far prefer to just pay for the damage out of pocket than run something like that through his commercial fleet insurance and see his premiums spike. Totally understandable, I have no problem with that.
My question is, the Escort only Blue Books for like $2200, and I'm not a bodyshopologist but it seems like it would cost in that same ballpark to get it fixed. I am obviously going to bring it to my body shop guy to get it looked at, but in circumstances like this, it isn't unreasonable to say "hey, the damage is almost/all of/in excess of the value of the car, so just write me a check for the value of said damage, we'll call it even, but I think I'd rather go shop for another car than dump $2k of repairs into a $2k car", right?
Just want to check the reasonableness before I call the company and make an ass of myself.
|
Responses:
|
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
|
|