ST Alpha - "It's $20mil for a mediocre pitcher. There's no positive value." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 158

In response to "Angels needed to address Pitching and theyve at least made an effort. 1yr is not bad -- nm" by budice

It's $20mil for a mediocre pitcher. There's no positive value.

Posted by Will Hunting (aka JoeMetz) Nov 16 '21, 08:20

Best case, he gives them $20mil in production. At which point, the Angels then need to pay him market value next year. Worse case, he's unplayable.

You didn't even get an option year in case he's a legitimate good player.

Responses:

The Angels should be going for some of the best pitchers available. Not someone recovering from surgery that caused him to miss a year of play. -- nm - Krusty Nov 16, 08:24 2
- They need so many pitchers, they can't pay 30mil on another 1 name - Will Hunting Nov 16, 08:28 1
  - Yeah, this all makes sense. They would be much better off going for the Rodriguez's of the world than a big name that's not shown a lot - Krusty Nov 16, 08:42

Post a message top

It's $20mil for a mediocre pitcher. There's no positive value.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.